A hunch becomes confirmed
The founder's suspicion about a certain client type walking away gets checked against actual logged reasons across many deals, turning a feeling into something they can act on with confidence.
Available now
In build
The whole team
Nineteen specialists, each with a defined job and an honest status label.
See all nineteenThe business learns the real reasons deals slip away instead of only knowing that they did.
Works with
What it does
Jeet prompts a rep to select a reason when a deal is marked won or lost, then rolls those reasons up into a report the owner can review. Patterns — like a specific objection recurring — surface automatically.
A marketing agency's founder has a nagging feeling that a certain kind of prospect keeps walking away at the proposal stage, but nobody's actually tracked why — deals get marked "lost" in a spreadsheet with no reason attached, and the pattern the founder suspects stays a suspicion rather than something they can act on with confidence when deciding where to invest business-development time next quarter.
Win-loss reporting prompts a rep to select a reason the moment a deal is marked won or lost, then rolls those reasons up into a report the founder can actually review. A recurring objection — pricing too high for a certain client size, a competitor's faster turnaround — surfaces as a pattern across many deals rather than staying a hunch nobody had the data to confirm or dismiss.
Jeet runs this directly on the platforms your customers already use — no separate app for them to install.
How it works
When a rep marks a deal won or lost, they're prompted to select why, capturing the reason while the deal and its details are still fresh rather than trying to reconstruct it weeks later from memory.
Individual reasons across many closed deals aggregate into a report the founder can review regularly, showing which objections or advantages come up most often, rather than staying scattered across separate deal notes indefinitely, forgotten by everyone.
A recurring reason — the same objection appearing across several lost deals — is highlighted in the rollup, drawing attention to it rather than requiring someone to notice the pattern by manually reading through every reason logged so far.
The list of selectable reasons is customised specifically for the agency's own particular situation rather than using a generic list borrowed wholesale from a completely different kind of business altogether, facing entirely different problems of its own.
Why it matters
The founder's suspicion about a certain client type walking away gets checked against actual logged reasons across many deals, turning a feeling into something they can act on with confidence.
Seeing which lead sources or client types close well versus which stall out lets the agency invest pitch time where the pattern actually supports it, not where it feels intuitively promising.
A rep selects the outcome reason right when the deal closes, rather than trying to remember and reconstruct the real reason weeks or months after the fact when detail has faded.
The detail
This report is only as good as what reps actually bother to enter, and that's the real constraint, not a limitation of the mechanism itself. A rep in a hurry to move to the next pitch can select whatever reason is quickest to click rather than the true one, and low completion rates — reps skipping the prompt, or repeatedly selecting a generic "other" — quietly undermine the report's value without anyone noticing. Making the step quick and easy, and occasionally checking completion rates rather than trusting the rollup blindly, matters as much as building the feature itself.
Sample size is the second real limitation, applying with particular force to a business that's newer or closes deals relatively infrequently. A pattern built from five lost deals can look as visually convincing in a chart as one built from fifty, but the smaller sample is far more likely to be coincidence — a founder acting decisively on a five-deal pattern risks redirecting real effort based on what might just be noise. Treating early patterns as suggestive rather than conclusive avoids this trap.
Generic reason categories borrowed from a template built for a different kind of business force reps into an approximate rather than accurate answer, which degrades the report from the first entry. An agency's real loss reasons — a competitor's faster turnaround, a retainer-size mismatch, a client going in-house — look nothing like a retail business's categories, and a mismatched list gets reps clicking the closest option rather than the true one, producing a report that looks precise but rests on approximations throughout.
Industry use cases
8 industries where Jeet applies this directly.
A dealership's website form captures an interested buyer's contact details, Jeet creates the lead and assigns it to the on-duty sales rep, and a follow-up task is created if the rep hasn't logged an activity within two days.
See the automotive playbookA software reseller's rep enrolls a shortlist of prospect companies into an email-and-call sequence, and Jeet pauses the sequence automatically the moment a decision-maker replies so the next touch is a live conversation instead of another templated email.
See the b2b sales playbookA financial advisory firm receives an inbound inquiry through its website, Jeet routes it to the specialist covering that product line, and the call recording consent is logged before any call is placed.
See the banking and finance playbookA coaching institute's demo-class signup form feeds directly into Jeet, and the lead's score rises after they attend the demo, moving them to the top of the counselor's call queue.
See the education playbookA home-decor studio's client requests a revised quote after a site visit, and Jeet keeps both quote versions attached to the same deal so the rep can see exactly what changed.
See the home decor and furnishing playbookAn agency's referral lead comes in tagged by source, and Jeet's win-loss reporting later shows that referral-sourced deals close at a different rate than cold outbound, informing where the agency invests its business-development time.
See the marketing agencies playbookA broker's site-visit is scheduled through the meeting scheduler, and Jeet automatically creates a follow-up task for the day after the visit so interest doesn't fade before the next contact.
See the real estate playbookA travel agent's WhatsApp inquiry about a family holiday package becomes a deal, and Jeet tracks when the itinerary PDF is opened so the agent knows exactly when to call and close.
See the travel and tourism playbookMore from Jeet
The business stops losing leads that arrive scattered across WhatsApp, website forms, calls, and marketplaces because every new contact lands in one place automatically.
Learn moreSales owners see exactly where every deal stands and which ones are stuck, instead of guessing from memory or a spreadsheet.
Learn moreReps spend their limited calling time on the leads most likely to convert instead of working the list top-to-bottom.
Learn moreDeals stop sitting untouched in the wrong stage because Jeet updates them the moment a defined event happens, without a rep remembering to do it.
Learn moreNo lead goes cold because they weren't followed up with — the next email, call reminder, or WhatsApp message goes out on schedule without a human remembering.
Learn moreReps make and log calls from inside one screen instead of switching to a phone and then re-typing notes into the CRM afterward.
Learn moreQuestions
This is the report's real weak point — the data is only as good as what reps genuinely bother to enter, and a rushed or careless selection quietly undermines the value of the whole rollup without it being obvious that it's happening. Keeping the prompt quick and easy to answer properly, and occasionally checking how often reps are picking a generic catch-all reason rather than a specific one, helps keep the underlying data honest.
There's no fixed number, but a pattern built from just a handful of deals can look exactly as visually confident as one built from many more, while being far more likely to be coincidence rather than a genuine trend. A newer or lower-volume business should treat an early pattern as a lead worth watching rather than a settled fact worth redirecting significant business-development effort around immediately.
Yes, and this matters more than it might seem — a generic reason list borrowed from a different kind of business forces reps toward an approximate answer rather than the actual, specific reason a deal was won or lost. Setting up reason categories that genuinely reflect the agency's own real situation, from the start, keeps the data specific enough to actually be useful rather than vaguely correct.
No — the reason prompt fires specifically at the moment a deal's outcome is recorded, so the report reflects closed deals only, not ones still sitting open in the pipeline. Forecasting how open deals are likely to go is a separate capability entirely, built around stage probability rather than a recorded reason that doesn't exist yet for something still in progress.
The rest of your stack
No rip-and-replace — understand why deals are won or lost works alongside the systems already running your business.
Coming soon