No interruption to reading
A quick definition arrives without switching apps or losing the thread of the document being read, keeping the momentum of understanding genuinely intact throughout the whole process.
Available now
In build
The whole team
Nineteen specialists, each with a defined job and an honest status label.
See all nineteenThe business owner can look up any unfamiliar legal or contractual term the moment they encounter it, without interrupting their reading to search elsewhere.
Works with
What it does
The owner types or highlights a term (e.g., "indemnity," "force majeure," "cheque bounce") and Vakil returns a plain-language definition with a general example of where the term commonly appears. Definitions are general and not tied to how the term applies in the owner's specific document.
A founder reading a term sheet for the first time hits the word "indemnity" in the second paragraph and has to decide, mid-read, whether to stop and search for a definition somewhere else or just keep going and hope the meaning becomes clear from context. Neither option is particularly satisfying, and both interrupt her reading in different ways.
Vakil's glossary is built for exactly that moment. She types or highlights the term, and Vakil returns a plain-language definition with a general example of where the term commonly appears — without interrupting her reading to send her elsewhere. The definition is general, describing what "indemnity" typically means as a concept, not what it means in the specific clause she's looking at. The instant her question becomes about her document rather than the word itself, Vakil steers her to the tool built for that.
Vakil runs this directly on the platforms your customers already use — no separate app for them to install.
How it works
Enter an unfamiliar legal or contractual word the moment it's encountered — indemnity, force majeure, cheque bounce — without needing to leave the actual document or the conversation you're currently reading through, at all, ever.
Vakil returns a clear explanation of what the term generally means, written for a non-lawyer reader rather than in the dense legal phrasing the term usually appears in on the page, or in a contract itself.
Alongside the definition, a general example shows the kind of context the term commonly appears in, helping the meaning stick in memory well beyond just the dictionary-style wording of the definition alone, on its own.
The moment a lookup becomes about how the term applies in a particular document, Vakil routes to the plain-english-document-explainer so the answer stays grounded in the actual document's own real context, rather than pure guesswork.
Why it matters
A quick definition arrives without switching apps or losing the thread of the document being read, keeping the momentum of understanding genuinely intact throughout the whole process.
Definitions are written for a non-lawyer, not lifted from a dense legal dictionary that would itself need its own explanation to properly understand in the first place.
The lookup recognises when a question needs document-specific context and redirects there, instead of stretching a general definition to cover something it genuinely cannot at all.
The detail
The glossary's value lies in staying general, a deliberate choice rather than a limitation to work around. A term like force majeure has a broad, recognisable core meaning — an event outside the parties' control that excuses performance — but its actual scope in a given contract depends on how that specific clause was drafted: which events it lists, whether it requires notice, how it defines consequences. Vakil's glossary explains the core meaning and stops there, because extending it to her term sheet would mean interpreting her document, work belonging to the document explainer.
This handoff is the glossary's most important design decision. The moment a lookup becomes what does indemnity mean in this clause, rather than generally, the question has changed in kind — it now needs the actual clause text as context, not just the term in isolation. Vakil notices that shift and routes accordingly, since answering a document-specific question with only a general definition risks a technically accurate answer that misses what matters, which misleads more than admitting a limit.
Oversimplification is the standing risk on the other side of this boundary: a plain-language definition trades away nuance for clarity, and a term like force majeure genuinely varies by drafting in ways a general definition cannot fully convey. The glossary's definitions are reviewed to stay accurate as usage shifts, particularly after a law amendment changes how a term is commonly understood — but the founder reading a definition should treat it as a starting point, not the final word on what that term means for her deal.
Industry use cases
13 industries where Vakil applies this directly.
A car service center owner uploads a supplier parts agreement into the plain-english-document-explainer to understand the payment and return terms before their scheduled call with an advocate about a recurring late-delivery issue.
See the automotive playbookA wholesale distributor whose buyer has not paid an invoice 60 days past the agreed term uses the delayed-payment-notice-preparation capability to draft a factual reminder letter and reads the linked explanation of the MSEFC reference process before deciding whether to pursue it.
See the b2b sales playbookA financial advisory firm uses the compliance-deadline-tracker to see upcoming annual filing dates for their private limited company, then separately runs a referral-partner agreement through the document coverage checker before their advocate reviews it.
See the banking and finance playbookA home-based skincare brand owner runs a proposed product-line name through the trademark-name-availability-check before commissioning packaging design, then separately requests a plain-english explanation of a co-packer's manufacturing agreement.
See the beauty and cosmetics playbookA coaching institute founder converting from a proprietorship to a private limited company uses the document-checklist-builder to see what is generally needed, then books a lawyer consultation using the question-prep tool to confirm specifics with an advocate.
See the education playbookA freelance designer uploads a new client's service contract to the plain-english-document-explainer to understand the IP-ownership and payment-milestone clauses, then later uses the delayed-payment-notice-preparation tool when an invoice goes unpaid past its due date.
See the freelancers and consultants playbookA physiotherapy clinic owner hiring their first three employees uses the employment-document-starter-kit to draft appointment letters and reads the linked general note on labour-law categories before finalizing terms with their HR consultant.
See the health and wellness playbookA furniture seller whose delivery partner damaged a high-value shipment uses the consumer-complaint-preparation-helper to structure their complaint against the courier before submitting it through the National Consumer Helpline.
See the home decor and furnishing playbookA small agency about to sign a new retainer client runs the agreement through the plain-language-clause-flagger to see whether a dispute-resolution clause is present before sending it to their advocate for final review.
See the marketing agencies playbookA landlord dealing with a tenant who stopped paying rent uses the consultation-briefing-fact-organizer to log the missed-payment dates and notices sent, then uses the jurisdiction-and-authority-finder to understand generally whether their state's rent law or a civil suit route is the relevant path, before consulting an advocate.
See the real estate playbookA restaurant owner who received a written complaint letter from a food-delivery aggregator about a recurring order-fulfillment dispute uses the notice-and-letter-response-drafting-helper to prepare a factual first draft of their reply before their advocate finalizes it.
See the restaurants and food playbookA salon owner entering a franchise agreement with a brand uses the plain-language-clause-flagger to see whether territory and termination clauses are present before their scheduled review with a franchise lawyer.
See the spas and salons playbookA tour operator whose transport vendor cancelled a confirmed booking at the last minute uses the consumer-complaint-preparation-helper to structure a complaint against the vendor while separately checking their own customer-facing booking terms for a force-majeure clause using the document-explainer.
See the travel and tourism playbookMore from Vakil
The business owner understands what a contract, notice, or legal letter actually says and what it asks of them, without waiting for a lawyer callback just to understand the basics.
Learn moreThe business owner walks into a paid lawyer consultation with an organized list of questions and facts, so the lawyer's limited time is spent advising rather than gathering basic information.
Learn moreThe business owner gets a plain-language overview of a legal topic relevant to their business (e.g., what a security deposit clause typically covers) before they need it urgently.
Learn moreThe business owner knows exactly which documents and pieces of information to collect for a common business task (hiring, renting, registering) before starting it, avoiding wasted trips and delays.
Learn moreThe business gets a professionally structured starting draft for a common business document (NDA, service agreement, offer letter) instead of writing one from a blank page.
Learn moreThe business owner sees which standard clauses (termination, liability, confidentiality, dispute resolution) are present, weak, or absent in a contract before signing it, so they know what to specifically ask a lawyer about.
Learn moreQuestions
No — the glossary gives a general definition of what the term typically means, not an interpretation of how it functions in your particular document. A term like force majeure can vary enormously depending on how a specific clause is drafted. For that, use the plain-english-document-explainer, which reads your actual document and explains the term in its real context, not a general one entirely.
Because plain-language definitions trade some nuance for clarity by design — a term like indemnity or force majeure carries real complexity that a short, accessible definition can't fully capture on its own. The glossary is meant to get you oriented quickly, not to replace the deeper understanding a lawyer brings when the term genuinely matters for a decision you're making.
Definitions are reviewed periodically to stay accurate, particularly when a relevant law amendment shifts how a term is commonly understood or applied in practice. That said, treat any definition as a starting point for recognising and understanding a word generally, not as a legal authority — for anything consequential, confirming current usage with an advocate is the safer step to take.
No — that question is about judging a specific clause, not defining a word, and the glossary is built to stay out of that territory entirely and completely. Vakil will explain what the term generally means, and if you need to understand how it applies in your document, or whether a clause using it favours you, those are separate questions for the document explainer and, ultimately, an advocate.
The rest of your stack
No rip-and-replace — look up what a legal term actually means works alongside the systems already running your business.
Coming soon