Verify it yourself right away
A direct link to the bare act or official page means the answer can be checked against the actual source in the same sitting, not taken purely on trust.
Available now
In build
The whole team
Nineteen specialists, each with a defined job and an honest status label.
See all nineteenThe business owner sees the actual statute, section, or government circular relevant to their general question, in addition to a plain-language summary, so they (or their advocate) can verify it at the source rather than trusting a paraphrase.
Works with
What it does
The owner asks a general legal question, and Vakil returns a plain-language answer alongside direct links to the primary source — the bare act on India Code, a government portal page, or an official circular — rather than only a generated summary. If no verifiable primary source can be linked, Vakil says so explicitly instead of presenting an unsourced answer as fact.
A B2B seller asking a general legal question online usually gets a confident-sounding paragraph with no way to check where it came from — no section number, no link, nothing to hand to an advocate or verify independently before trusting it with something that actually matters to the business's future.
Vakil answers differently. It gives a plain-language answer alongside a direct link to the primary source — the bare act on India Code, a government portal page, or an official circular — rather than presenting only a generated summary as if it were self-evidently true. If no verifiable primary source can be linked to support the answer, Vakil says so explicitly and withholds the claim rather than presenting an unsourced guess with false confidence. Every substantive legal claim here is traceable, or it isn't made at all.
Vakil runs this directly on the platforms your customers already use — no separate app for them to install.
How it works
Type a question about a legal topic relevant to the business — what a statute covers, what a regulator requires — in plain language, without needing to know any legal terms at all in advance.
Get a clear explanation of what the relevant law or rule generally provides, written to be understood without any legal training required at all, addressing precisely the general question that was originally asked right here.
Alongside the answer, a link points to the actual bare act, government portal page, or official circular being carefully described, so the source can be checked directly instead of being simply trusted purely on faith.
If no verifiable primary source can be linked to support a claim, Vakil says so plainly and withholds the answer rather than presenting an unsourced claim to anyone as though it were settled, established fact.
Why it matters
A direct link to the bare act or official page means the answer can be checked against the actual source in the same sitting, not taken purely on trust.
An answer with no verifiable source gets withheld and flagged clearly, rather than presented with the same confidence as a properly sourced answer would carry.
A linked section or circular gives an advocate something concrete to begin from, rather than a summary they'd have to independently verify from nothing at all.
The detail
The defining discipline of this capability is that every substantive legal claim must be traceable to a cited, verified primary source — an Act, a section, or an official government page — before it's shown to anyone at all. A citation-verification process checks that a cited section actually exists and that the quoted text genuinely matches it, before an answer citing that source is displayed. A hallucinated statute is widely recognised as the single worst failure mode for a legal-information tool — a confident, wrong citation is more dangerous than honestly admitting uncertainty.
This is why refusal is treated as a legitimate, designed outcome rather than a failure. When no verifiable source can be found for a claim, Vakil says so explicitly and withholds or clearly labels the answer as unverified, rather than generating a plausible-sounding paragraph anyway. A business owner deserves to know the difference between a sourced answer with an exact place to check it, and an admission that no source exists — collapsing that distinction is worse than simply admitting a limit.
The sourcing draws from a defined set of primary references — India Code for the bare act text, and a curated index of government portals covering corporate affairs, the GST Council, IP India, and the Bar Council of India — rather than general web content that might itself be a paraphrase of a paraphrase. A secondary source summarising a law is not the same as the law itself, and the value of this capability rests on closing that exact gap.
Industry use cases
13 industries where Vakil applies this directly.
A car service center owner uploads a supplier parts agreement into the plain-english-document-explainer to understand the payment and return terms before their scheduled call with an advocate about a recurring late-delivery issue.
See the automotive playbookA wholesale distributor whose buyer has not paid an invoice 60 days past the agreed term uses the delayed-payment-notice-preparation capability to draft a factual reminder letter and reads the linked explanation of the MSEFC reference process before deciding whether to pursue it.
See the b2b sales playbookA financial advisory firm uses the compliance-deadline-tracker to see upcoming annual filing dates for their private limited company, then separately runs a referral-partner agreement through the document coverage checker before their advocate reviews it.
See the banking and finance playbookA home-based skincare brand owner runs a proposed product-line name through the trademark-name-availability-check before commissioning packaging design, then separately requests a plain-english explanation of a co-packer's manufacturing agreement.
See the beauty and cosmetics playbookA coaching institute founder converting from a proprietorship to a private limited company uses the document-checklist-builder to see what is generally needed, then books a lawyer consultation using the question-prep tool to confirm specifics with an advocate.
See the education playbookA freelance designer uploads a new client's service contract to the plain-english-document-explainer to understand the IP-ownership and payment-milestone clauses, then later uses the delayed-payment-notice-preparation tool when an invoice goes unpaid past its due date.
See the freelancers and consultants playbookA physiotherapy clinic owner hiring their first three employees uses the employment-document-starter-kit to draft appointment letters and reads the linked general note on labour-law categories before finalizing terms with their HR consultant.
See the health and wellness playbookA furniture seller whose delivery partner damaged a high-value shipment uses the consumer-complaint-preparation-helper to structure their complaint against the courier before submitting it through the National Consumer Helpline.
See the home decor and furnishing playbookA small agency about to sign a new retainer client runs the agreement through the plain-language-clause-flagger to see whether a dispute-resolution clause is present before sending it to their advocate for final review.
See the marketing agencies playbookA landlord dealing with a tenant who stopped paying rent uses the consultation-briefing-fact-organizer to log the missed-payment dates and notices sent, then uses the jurisdiction-and-authority-finder to understand generally whether their state's rent law or a civil suit route is the relevant path, before consulting an advocate.
See the real estate playbookA restaurant owner who received a written complaint letter from a food-delivery aggregator about a recurring order-fulfillment dispute uses the notice-and-letter-response-drafting-helper to prepare a factual first draft of their reply before their advocate finalizes it.
See the restaurants and food playbookA salon owner entering a franchise agreement with a brand uses the plain-language-clause-flagger to see whether territory and termination clauses are present before their scheduled review with a franchise lawyer.
See the spas and salons playbookA tour operator whose transport vendor cancelled a confirmed booking at the last minute uses the consumer-complaint-preparation-helper to structure a complaint against the vendor while separately checking their own customer-facing booking terms for a force-majeure clause using the document-explainer.
See the travel and tourism playbookMore from Vakil
The business owner understands what a contract, notice, or legal letter actually says and what it asks of them, without waiting for a lawyer callback just to understand the basics.
Learn moreThe business owner walks into a paid lawyer consultation with an organized list of questions and facts, so the lawyer's limited time is spent advising rather than gathering basic information.
Learn moreThe business owner gets a plain-language overview of a legal topic relevant to their business (e.g., what a security deposit clause typically covers) before they need it urgently.
Learn moreThe business owner knows exactly which documents and pieces of information to collect for a common business task (hiring, renting, registering) before starting it, avoiding wasted trips and delays.
Learn moreThe business gets a professionally structured starting draft for a common business document (NDA, service agreement, offer letter) instead of writing one from a blank page.
Learn moreThe business owner sees which standard clauses (termination, liability, confidentiality, dispute resolution) are present, weak, or absent in a contract before signing it, so they know what to specifically ask a lawyer about.
Learn moreQuestions
No. A sourced, verified citation tells you what a statute, section, or official page actually says — it doesn't tell you how that provision applies to your specific situation, which is a separate step requiring legal judgment about your own facts. The citation is the starting point for understanding the law and for a conversation with an advocate, not a substitute for either of those things.
It tells you plainly rather than answering anyway. If no primary source — a bare act, section, or official government page — can be verified for a substantive claim, Vakil withholds the claim or clearly labels it as unverified, because presenting an unsourced answer with false confidence is exactly the failure this tool exists to avoid at every single step.
Every citation passes a verification step that checks the cited section or Act genuinely exists and that the quoted text matches it, before the answer is ever shown to you at all. Beyond that built-in check, the direct link to the primary source means you can independently confirm it yourself in the same sitting, rather than relying on Vakil's word alone for anything.
Cited sources are checked periodically for staleness, but law does change, and a citation that was accurate when first verified can be superseded by a later amendment at any point. For anything you're relying on now, it's worth confirming currency directly against the linked primary source, or with an advocate, rather than assuming a past answer still reflects today's law exactly.
The rest of your stack
No rip-and-replace — find the actual law behind a question works alongside the systems already running your business.
Coming soon