No payment quietly missed
Every vendor and salary payment gets scanned against TDS thresholds automatically, reducing the chance a contractor or professional-fee payment that crossed a threshold goes unnoticed until later.
Available now
In build
The whole team
Nineteen specialists, each with a defined job and an honest status label.
See all nineteenThe owner (or their CA) has a clear worksheet of who was paid what, which payments crossed a TDS threshold, and what should have been deducted — ready for the CA to finalize and file.
Works with
What it does
Khata scans recorded vendor and salary payments, applies the relevant TDS section logic (e.g., contractor payments, professional fees, salary, rent) to flag payments that likely required a deduction, and compiles the figures into worksheets structured like Forms 24Q, 26Q, and 27Q. The CA reviews, corrects, and files the actual TDS return.
A marketing agency pays several freelance video editors during a campaign, and somewhere between a retainer invoice and a one-off project fee, nobody's quite sure which payments crossed the threshold requiring tax deducted at source under Section 194J, or by how much. Guessing wrong either way — deducting when it wasn't required, or missing a deduction that was — creates a problem that surfaces months later, at a far worse time to fix it.
The TDS deduction worksheet scans recorded vendor and salary payments, applies the relevant section logic for contractor payments, professional fees, salary, and rent, and flags payments that likely required a deduction, compiling the figures into worksheets structured like Forms 24Q, 26Q, and 27Q. The worksheet is a draft the CA reviews, corrects, and finalises — Khata does not calculate a final, filing-ready liability without the CA's sign-off, and it never files the actual TDS return itself.
Khata runs this directly on the platforms your customers already use — no separate app for them to install.
How it works
Recorded vendor and salary payments are checked against the relevant TDS section thresholds — contractor payments, professional fees, salary, rent — to identify exactly which payments likely crossed the point requiring a deduction to be made.
Each flagged payment is tagged with the TDS section it likely falls under, such as 194C for a contractor or 194J for professional fees, based on how the payment and the vendor were originally recorded.
Flagged payments and their likely sections roll up into worksheets laid out like Forms 24Q, 26Q, and 27Q, giving the CA a structured starting point to actually review, rather than a long, unsorted raw payment list.
The CA checks each flagged payment and section against the actual facts of the arrangement, corrects anything the automated flag got wrong, and only then finalises the figures that eventually get filed with the department.
Why it matters
Every vendor and salary payment gets scanned against TDS thresholds automatically, reducing the chance a contractor or professional-fee payment that crossed a threshold goes unnoticed until later.
A likely applicable section is flagged against each payment based on how it was recorded, giving the CA a starting hypothesis to confirm rather than reading through every payment blind.
Figures roll up into a worksheet shaped like the actual TDS forms, so the CA's review is about confirming figures already organised, not building that structure themselves first.
The detail
TDS section applicability is genuinely fact-specific in a way that transaction data alone often can't settle, and this worksheet is built around that limitation rather than pretending it away. Whether a payment is a contractor payment under 194C or a professional fee under 194J depends on the arrangement's nature — a video editor paid a flat fee and one paid a retainer look identical as "payment to vendor," while carrying different TDS treatment the record alone doesn't capture — exactly why CA review is mandatory.
The worksheet's flags are deliberately conservative in framing: a flagged payment is a hypothesis about likely applicability, not a settled determination of any kind. Khata does not calculate a final, filing-ready liability without the CA's sign-off, does not generate Form 16 or 16A, and does not file 24Q, 26Q, 27Q, or 27EQ — every step happens after the CA's review, deliberately outside what this capability does alone.
The cost of getting this stage wrong runs in both directions, which is part of why the worksheet is framed as a draft rather than a determination outright. A missed deduction flag can expose the business to disallowance or interest on the shortfall; an incorrectly flagged payment, acted on without review, creates its own reconciliation headache for the payee. Marking every figure here clearly as a draft pending review is what keeps either mistake from being made with false confidence, and it's why the agency scenario ends with the CA deciding the actual deduction, not the worksheet.
Industry use cases
4 industries where Khata applies this directly.
A wholesale distributor pays several transport contractors during the month, and Khata flags which payments likely crossed the TDS threshold for Section 194C, compiling a worksheet the CA reviews before determining the actual deduction and filing.
See the b2b sales playbookA freelance designer invoices three clients in a month and photographs a handful of software-subscription receipts, and Khata compiles both sides into a period summary the freelancer forwards to their CA before the quarterly GST filing.
See the freelancers and consultants playbookA marketing agency pays several freelance video editors as contractors during a campaign, and Khata's TDS worksheet flags the professional-fee payments likely requiring deduction under Section 194J for the CA's review before the agency deducts and deposits tax.
See the marketing agencies playbookA real-estate broker running two project-specific entities under separate GSTINs views a consolidated cash-position dashboard for planning, while their CA still receives two entirely separate GST summaries, one per GSTIN, for filing.
See the real estate playbookMore from Khata
A business owner stops losing paper receipts because every bill is captured the moment it's created, from a phone camera, a forwarded email, or a bulk upload.
Learn moreThe owner no longer types out every item, date, vendor, and amount from a receipt by hand — Khata reads it and fills the fields.
Learn moreThe business creates invoices that already carry the correct GSTIN, HSN/SAC code, and tax split so nothing needs re-keying at return time.
Learn moreEvery sale, purchase, payment, and receipt lands in a proper double-entry ledger instead of a loose spreadsheet or paper khata.
Learn moreEvery edit to the books is permanently recorded with who changed what and when, satisfying the statutory requirement companies already face.
Learn moreExpenses land in the right category (rent, salaries, supplies, utilities) automatically instead of the owner deciding from scratch every time.
Learn moreQuestions
No. The worksheet flags payments likely requiring a deduction and suggests the applicable section, compiled into a structure resembling Forms 24Q, 26Q, and 27Q, but this is a draft your CA reviews and corrects fully. Khata does not produce a final, filing-ready liability without the CA's own sign-off, ever acting entirely on its own initiative or independent judgement about the figures.
No — Khata prepares the worksheet as a structured draft for your CA's review; it does not generate Form 16 or 16A, and it does not file 24Q, 26Q, 27Q, or 27EQ with the Income Tax Department at all. Filing the actual return, once the CA has finalised the figures, happens through the CA's own entirely separate filing process, outside Khata altogether.
That's exactly the kind of judgement call your CA is meant to make during review — the flag reflects a likely section based on how the payment was recorded, but the actual facts of the arrangement, which the payment record alone may not fully capture, determine whether it genuinely applied. Raise it with your CA directly rather than assuming either answer is automatically correct.
It applies TDS section logic based on how the payment and vendor are recorded — a contractor payment, a professional fee, salary, or rent — but this is a likely-applicable flag, not a settled fact of the matter. Because section applicability genuinely depends on the underlying arrangement's specifics, your CA reviews and corrects the flagged section before treating it as final.
The rest of your stack
No rip-and-replace — prepare tds deduction worksheets works alongside the systems already running your business.
Coming soon